Re: [LAD] RME madi latency

Hi Adrian,

I could’ve guessed you were on this list as well :-)
I’m going to try this tomorrow when back in the studio, or maybe I can even do it remote if I have left everything patched up correctly :-)

I will come back with the results.
Thanks for your input!

fokke

> On Feb 3, 2016, at 14:21 , Adrian Knoth <adi@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> On 02/03/16 14:04, Fokke de Jong wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>
> Hi!
>
>> I have a RME madi fx card, but i found out that the minimal buffersize
>> for those cards is 8192 samples, which is way to big for my use.
>
> Hardware buffer size. This buffer is divided into sub-buffers (periods)
> depending on what you configure.
>
> If you choose 32 samples, then it's 8192/32 == 256 periods that fit into
> one buffer. You get an interrupt every 32 samples, and ALSA reads the
> just completed sub-buffer.
>
> The HW buffer size really has zero relation to your RTT.
>
> Spin up jackd and then use Fons' jack_delay. Maybe we have to add
> buffer_size_min to the driver, but I'm pretty sure returning the card is
> the entirely wrong approach.
>
>
> HTH
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev