Re: [LAD] Code reordering

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jonathan Brickman <jeb@email-addr-hidden>
wrote:

> On 3/1/2016 11:40 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> the JACK implementation relies on two things to work:
>
> * pointer and integer operations are (weakly) atomic on all platforms
> that JACK runs on
> * code reordering will either not happen or will be prevented by the
> compiler
>
> Does #2 mean that -O3 should always be avoided when compiling JACK clients?
>

No, it does not.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Mar 2 20:15:02 2016