Re: [LAD] Portaudio or something else?

From: Harry van Haaren <harryhaaren@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Sep 08 2016 - 13:18:29 EEST

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Christopher Arndt <chris@email-addr-hidden>
wrote:
> Am 08.09.2016 um 09:25 schrieb Bengt Gördén:
>> Is Portaudio the best choice for portability or
>> is there some other option that might be better?
>
> You might want to have a look at RtAudio or even JUCE too.

RtAudio I can recommend - it provides a realtively simple API and has a
large user-base.
JUCE implements its own audio classes - but also "everything else and the
kitchen sink".

If this is a simple programming excercise, I recommend using RtAudio
(instead of JUCE or PortAudio).
RtAudio is just two files, compile in and no external dependencies.

My two cents : ) -Harry

--
http://www.openavproductions.com

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Sep 8 16:15:01 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 08 2016 - 16:15:02 EEST