Re: [LAD] ?==?utf-8?q? 'A' note Tuning Range

From: Ralf Mattes <rm@email-addr-hidden-freiburg.de>
Date: Wed Apr 10 2019 - 19:55:34 EEST

 
Am Mittwoch, 10. April 2019 18:38 CEST, Len Ovens <len@ovenwerks.net> schrieb:
 
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Will J Godfrey wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:23:54 +0200
> > <linux@justmail.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Without doubts it should be 440 Hz +- 50 Cent.
> >
> > Thanks everyone for your comments. There seems to be a general consensus (and
> > elsewhere too) so I'll check nobody actually *is* using extreme settings for
> > some reason, and maybe tame it down a bit.
>
> For tuning, anything greater than half way between semitones can be
> acheived with transpose. Or, to put it another way, if you need to detune
> by that much, you are really playing in a different key.

Hmm, no. You are mixing up frequency with pitch class. (Ab)using transposition for changing
pitch only works for equal temprament (but OP referes to Scala tunings).
Even in my rather limited world of baroque music playing I've used: 440, 415 (modern pseudo-baroque),
432, 392 (french low), 456 (high Venetian), 517 ...
That has nothing whatsoever todo with transposition.

Just my 0.2 $

 Cheers, RalfD

> --
> Len Ovens
> www.ovenwerks.net
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Apr 10 20:15:01 2019

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 10 2019 - 20:15:01 EEST