Re: [LAD] NSM fork

From: Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Jan 30 2021 - 00:44:32 EET

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 07:59:58PM +0000, John Rigg wrote:
 
> I don't think the fork was handled very well, with antagonism
> on both sides which could easily have been avoided with a
> little forethought.

Indeed.
 
> The choice of the name New Session Manager and the re-use of
> the NSM initials is an obvious problem IMO.

I agree. Also presenting this as a consortium project is
questionable to put it mildly.

Clearly some of the language in Jonathan's post (and on his
website) is not acceptable. But he is not the only one to
blame for the current sad situation.

> At the very least, Jonathan Liles' list membership should
> be reinstated.

I agree.

-- 
FA
 
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Feb 2 04:15:02 2021

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 02 2021 - 04:15:02 EET