[linux-audio-user] Re: Latency with ALSA

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: Latency with ALSA
From: Norbert Wolff (norbert_wolff_AT_t-online.de)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 14:37:16 EEST


On 01 Apr 2003 22:57:28 -0500
Nick <nicktsocanos_AT_charter.net> wrote:

> I am writing audio applications that are real-time.
> I had been using Port Audio which is really very good, even without root
> priviledges, it does a very good job. I want to support other sound
> drivers, in case someone doesn't have Port Audio or can't get it to
> work.
>
> I have just built my ALSA driver, it works ok, but I am getting terrible
> latency problems and buffer underruns. The thing is it is a real-time
> application, it must get audio to the card as soon as possible. Why is
> it that OSS with Port Audio works so well, and my ALSA setup is
> suffering?
>
> Is there something I need to do to ALSA to get near real-time
> performance from it? I have heard people mention patching their kernel
> for low latency. I have Jack but I have not started working with it yet.
> Should I dump ALSA and just go for Jack? Is there something I need to do
> to my kernel to get better performance? I would get Planet CCRMA if it
> supported my OS, but it doesn't, so I have to tweak my box manually.

High Nick !

At the moment there are two different approaches for low-latency in the
linux-kernel.

The first is from Ingo Molnar; it's quite simple but efficient (conditional
scheduling at critical places).
You can get it at
 http://people.redhat.com/mingo/lowlatency-patches/lowlatency-2.4.0-test7-A0

The second is made by Robert Love, it makes real heavy Changes in the Kernel
which have a noticeable negative impact on overall System-througput, but the
results are quite amazing !

The Patch is integrated int the 2.5-Kernel (CONFIG_PREEMPT), patches for 2.4
are available at
 ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/

I use Robert's patch with the 2.5-Kernel since half a year without Problems;
The interactive response of the Sytem under high loads is now MUCH better.
Lacking real real-time Software i don't know if it helps there too.

If the low-latency patches for the Kernel don't cure your Problem, consider
testing a new 2.5.6x-Kernel; the scheduler was really improved in the last
months ...


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Apr 02 2003 - 14:22:25 EEST