Re: [linux-audio-user] low latency kernel

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] low latency kernel
From: Frank Barknecht (fbar_AT_footils.org)
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 12:18:54 EEST


Hallo,
Joern Nettingsmeier hat gesagt: // Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:

> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> >* How's it working? Would you recommend going 2.5?
>
> fine. EXCEPT: DO NOT USE TAGGED COMMAND QUEUING FOR ATA DISKS !!!!!!
> sorry for yelling, but this thing ate 200G worth of data....
> :)
> other than that, it's been quite well-behaved.

Thanks for that info! But we all have backups. haven't we. (/me
blushes)

> >* What is needed to use 2.5?
>
> /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes
> expect to update a number of userspace tools, most notably modutils.

I'm running Debian unstable, so I probably already have most of these.

> >* When will 2.6 come out?
>
> when it's ready :)
> you might be happy to hear that linus has released 2.6.0-test1. not that
> this has any significance whatsoever. :)

I expected this answer. ;) 2.4 had a very long 2.4.0-testX phase, but
at least this has started the beta phase for the next version.

Actually I'm asking for experiences with 2.5 because I'm writing an
article on setting up a Linux audio workstation and I'm wondering if I
should cover the 2.5-series in more depth than just saying: "2.5 has
better latency built in, but use it only if you know what you're
doing". But then, maybe instead of explaining how to patch the
2.4-kernel, I could just say: "install 2.5 and enable ALSA. Now on to
installing Jack..." ;)

ciao

-- 
 Frank Barknecht                               _ ______footils.org__


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 12:25:01 EEST