Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] TiMidity++ and FluidSynth
From: Dave Phillips (dlphilp_AT_bright.net)
Date: Thu Nov 27 2003 - 18:00:21 EET
Greetings:
For all purposes these days TiMidity == TiMidity++. The original app
is no longer developed by its original coder, nor has it been developed
for years. There's no practical reason to go calling it TiMidity++. But
if it makes you happy... ;)
Best regards,
== dp
Joerg Anders wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Dave Phillips wrote:
>
>
>
>> TiMidity can be configured to use soundfonts. Here's the contents of
>>my ~/timidity.cfg file :
>>
>>
>>
>
>I would use TiMidity++. The problem is: In contrast to FluidSynth
>TiMidity loads the instruments not until they are really needed.
>
>That is: If the clarinet keeps silent for - say - 20 measures
>the clarinet waves are not loaded. In measure 20 TiMidity
>starts loading the clarinet. This requires processor time
>and leads to a short gap. (Also with my 2.4 GHz Intel)
>
>Does anybody know how to change this behaviour?
>
>And: Does anybody know how to recorord the FluidSynth
>aoutput into a WAV file ?
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Nov 27 2003 - 17:54:15 EET