Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Which kernel for low latency?
From: James Stone (stone1_AT_btinternet.com)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2004 - 00:59:19 EET
Yep I have got Jack working with all versions of 2.6.x
It runs as root no problem or with jackstart with capabilities patch
applied as per jack FAQ.
Just a silly question but you have got the volumes turned up on the
mixer haven't you?
James
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 08:09:43AM +1300, Glenn McCord wrote:
> I've been using a 2.4.2 kernel with Andrew Morton's patches and I got
> jack to work very well. However, seeing 2.6 is the latest and greatest
> I'd like to switch but am having no luck thus far.
>
> Q. If anyone has got jack to work great with a 2.6(.1) kernel could you
> share with me what version of the 2.6 kernel you used and what patches
> (if any)
>
> At the moment I'm trying a 2.6.1 with an mm4 patch but I'm getting no
> sound with my soundblaster live.
> I've done:
> <*> Sound card support
>
> and, under Advanced Linux Sound Architecture --->
>
> <*> Advanced Linux Sound Architecture
> <*> Sequencer support
> <*> OSS API emulation
> <*> OSS Mixer API
> <*> OSS PCM (digital audio) API
> <*> OSS Sequencer API
>
> rebooted and install alsa-lib-1.0.1 and alsa-utils-1.0.1 as well but I
> get these errors
>
> root_AT_upstairs glenn # aplay /usr/kde/3.2/share/sounds/pop.wav
> ALSA lib pcm_hw.c:1055:(snd_pcm_hw_open) open /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p failed:
> No such file or directory
> aplay: main:502: audio open error: No such file or directory
>
> and
>
> glenn_AT_upstairs glenn $ alsamixer
> No mixer elems found
>
> I'm at a loss but am interested at what type of kernel others are using.
> I think my next best bet is to remove alsa from the kernel and install
> it seperately.
>
> Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Jan 17 2004 - 00:57:49 EET