RE: [linux-audio-user] suggested Window Manager good for audio?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: RE: [linux-audio-user] suggested Window Manager good for audio?
From: Matthew Allen (matthew_AT_lith.com)
Date: Thu Feb 19 2004 - 01:31:22 EET


        That's just the main binary for fvwm. If you include all of the
modules I think it would put it up past icewm and maybe even past
fluxbox. My linux box is at home, but I'll check tonight.

m.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces_AT_music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces_AT_music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Frank Barknecht
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] suggested Window Manager good for
audio?
>
> Judging by file size, fluxbox is rather bloated, but blackbox comes
> out smallest - not counting the anorectic window managers like swm or
> failsafewm (ouch!) from www.small-window-manager.de:
>
> -rwxrwxr-x 1 freak freak 7404 Feb 18 23:58 failsafewm
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 257472 Apr 14 2003
/usr/bin/blackbox
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 359160 Mar 23 2003 /usr/bin/fvwm2
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 406668 Mar 13 2003 /usr/bin/icewm
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 625828 Jan 27 2003
/usr/bin/fluxbox

_________________________________________________
Scanned on 18 Feb 2004 23:30:52
Scanning by http://erado.com


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Feb 19 2004 - 01:29:50 EET