Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Quattro USB
From: Josh Steiner (josh_AT_vitriolix.com)
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 19:50:44 EEST
i really just need to point out that frank seems to have a personal
vendetta against the quattro. it does violate the USB spec in a minor
way that pretty much every os manages to deal with fine. for a short
time the 2.6.x linux kernels didnt support the quattro, but there is a
fix for that now. the quattro is *far* from a "total piece of junk",
its actually a great deal.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
>Hallo,
>Wade Winright hat gesagt: // Wade Winright wrote:
>
>
>
>>Thanks again for the reply, and I may take your advice and stay completely
>>away from USB.
>>
>>
>
>On a laptop, USB is a decent way to get sound. Just not with the
>Quattro. Which is a total piece of junk. I own one, I know it. Stay
>clear of the Quattro and - to make things simple - of all M-Audio USB
>devices as many are just crap.
>
>Having said that, there are many good USB devices, that do actually
>work. This ranges from simple inexpensive multichannel devices like
>the Audiotrak USB devs up to the Tascam USB devices or the Terratec
>Phase 26, which all provide high quality recording. I tested a lot of
>devices (~20) and most also worked decent with Jack.
>
>Of course, PCMICA cards have various advantages, but in general they
>tend to be much, much more expensive as well. Why not just try USB
>out - either from a mailorder which takes it back - or in a shop?
>
>Ciao
>
>
-- ________________________________________________________________ live experimental electronic music -- http://bluevitriol.com independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Apr 21 2004 - 19:46:44 EEST