Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Quattro USB
From: Josh Steiner (josh_AT_vitriolix.com)
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 21:58:10 EEST
i understand the frustration behind the vendetta, as i too had tons of
trouble getting the quattro to work on 2.4.x and was pretty irked when
it looked like 2.6.x wasnt going to support it period, but i just dont
see the need to call it a "total piece of junk" everytime the quattro
comes up on a list, especially now that that it seems that the troubles
with the quattro are historical. and yeah, i have much respect for
frank, i'm not trolling him, i just dont want people to get a mistaken
impression of the quattro as i'm quite happy with it.
Matthew Allen wrote:
>I never saw it as a vendetta, just more of a "this thing stole months of
>my life away, please don't let it steal months from yours"
>
>:)
>
>m.
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: linux-audio-user-bounces_AT_music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
>>user-bounces_AT_music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Josh Steiner
>>Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Quattro USB
>>
>>i really just need to point out that frank seems to have a personal
>>vendetta against the quattro. it does violate the USB spec in a minor
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________
>Scanned on 21 Apr 2004 17:50:42
>Scanning by http://erado.com
>
>
-- ________________________________________________________________ live experimental electronic music -- http://bluevitriol.com independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Apr 21 2004 - 21:56:33 EEST