Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] pd vs. supercollider
From: Michal Seta (mis_AT_creazone.32k.org)
Date: Sat Apr 24 2004 - 20:48:46 EEST
Tim Blechmann <TimBlechmann_AT_gmx.net> writes:
> i had a look at impd, yesterday ... i haven't been able to use it (work
> in progress), but i'll definitely have a look at it again, when it's
> done ...
It may take a while :)
> and i'm willing to try to merge the dsp changes between the
> devel and the impd branch ...
cool :) May I tell Mathieu about it? :)
> what i criticize is not _what_ mathieu is doing, but that there is no
> roadmap where pd should go. mathieu set up his own roadmap, but probably
> his impd and millers future stable releases will go to different
> directions ...
> there is too little communication between the pd developers ...
I agree and it seems that this was the case from the beginning (I
started using pd at around version .29). But there seems to be a lot of
uncertainty about directions among the developers, although I have not
really seen any vigurous disagreements... perhaps it's just lack of
any clear future goals? I know I seem to be taking
impd's side but I'm not really hooked on it yet. I would just give
mathieu a point for the initiative and action in moving towards the
realisation.
Ok, I think we've move sufficiently off-topic here... Sorry.
--
_
__ __ (_)___ Michal Seta
/ \/ \ _/^ _|
/ V |_ \ @creazone.32k.org
(___/V\___|_|___/
http://www.[creazone]|[noonereceiving].32k.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Apr 24 2004 - 20:44:36 EEST