Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] well well
From: Aaron Trumm (aaron_AT_nquit.com)
Date: Mon Apr 26 2004 - 05:21:58 EEST
someone else mentioned seq too and I've been trying to use it but can't get
the syntax right - what you've just posted is new to me
is there a bash reference somewhere? obviously there is - the tutorial I
was reading didn't mention seq though
I tried
for X in seq '1 9'
and
for X in seq 1 9
but neither of those works
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Barknecht" <fbar_AT_footils.org>
To: "A list for linux audio users" <linux-audio-user_AT_music.columbia.edu>
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] well well
> Hallo,
> Aaron Trumm hat gesagt: // Aaron Trumm wrote:
>
> > don't blame me if it blows you up. it shouldn't, it's a pretty
> > simple inane cdparanoia/lame using script. fun. did I do anything
> > horribly stupid?
>
> Nothing I see, but you will love the utility "seq" which will shorten
> your script immensely:
>
> $ seq -w 100
> 001
> 002
> 003
> 004
> 005
> 006
> 007
> 008
> 009
> 010
> 011
> ...
> 096
> 097
> 098
> 099
> 100
>
> Ciao
> --
> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Apr 26 2004 - 03:24:23 EEST