Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: producing a drum sample library for hydrogen

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: producing a drum sample library for hydrogen
From: LinuxMedia (linuxmedia4_AT_netscape.net)
Date: Sat Jun 19 2004 - 04:24:30 EEST


> Meh, I can't tell the difference. I've yet to hear a compelling
> argument for preferring anything more than 16bit/44.1k. Personal
> opinions abound, but the plural of "anecdote" is not "data."

I swear I can hear the difference between 16bit/44.1k and 16bit/48k.
When I decided to use the extra 3.9K that my card allows, I did a "side
by side test" of a 44.1K and 48K. The difference is quality is enough
for me to record at a standard 48K rate.

While we're on the subject. I noticed that a some of the sound font
files that I've looked at have 33K audio files. Anyone know why this
perticular sampling rate? I'm not being really diligent and going thru
all my sound font files. I'm going from memory, and it seems I've seen
this sampling rate in several sound fonts.

Rocco


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Jun 19 2004 - 08:21:55 EEST