RE: [linux-audio-user] Re: Sample Rates / Sample Sizes

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: RE: [linux-audio-user] Re: Sample Rates / Sample Sizes
From: RickTaylor_AT_speakeasy.net
Date: Thu Jun 24 2004 - 08:52:28 EEST


This rocks just a bit... It's not precisely what you want but it's got some
good information {you'll be needing to "unfold" it.}:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=16&q=http://www.meridian-audio.com/ara/codi
ng2.pdf&e=7317

Good page that's "almost" related:
http://www.surroundmusic.net/articles/dtsco1.html

I know I've read this discussion 1oo times... I'm sure there must be a few faqs
and articles out here.

 {I wonder if there's a "Google Home Companion" available.}

On 23-Jun-2004 Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
} >From: Jan Depner <eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net>
} >
} >I also hear a difference though when I record 24/44.1 and 24/96.
}
} How about 24/48 vs. 24/96? Some cards are optimized to 48 kHz and
} if one goes to use 44.1 kHz the performance may not be optimal.
} It even could be that in some cards the performance is optimized
} for 96 kHz instead of 48 kHz.
}
} One could start the tests by comparing if an audio bandlimited to
} 15 kHz comes through the system the same way independent of
} what sampling rate was used. What would be the limit frequency
} where differences starts? Is that frequency hearable? A/B tests
} on the listener. If yes, it would naturally explane why one
} hears the difference.
}
} If all these aspects are already tested, I would like to
} hear where. Perhaps www.aes.org would be a good place to start
} searching.
}
} Juhana

----------------------------------
E-Mail: RickTaylor_AT_Speakeasy.Net
Date: 24-Jun-2004
Time: 00:47:29

This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jun 24 2004 - 08:48:33 EEST