Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: giga files and large soundfonts

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: giga files and large soundfonts
From: Mark Knecht (mknecht_AT_controlnet.com)
Date: Wed Jun 30 2004 - 20:19:03 EEST


Christian Frisson wrote:
> Heyall,
>
> Once again, I see there's always somebody to urge you to reveal your plots ,-)
> Good, I'm now compelled to spawn something!

<hehe!!> we know you and others are out there! ;-)

<SNIP>

> 2) Looping or time-stretching?
> To my ears, looping sometimes adds another kind of uninvited LFO, while
> time-stretching may seem unatural... Any Time-Streching challenging opensource
> piece of software?

Why not just let GSt/LS do this as required?

<SNIP>

>
> 4) The more the merrier?
> Should we benefit from using the most available sampled notes for precision or
> less for RAM/ROM/CPU-ease? 44100 Hz seems to be a bit short for pitchshifting...

I vote more notes and less pitch shifting.

Please stay with 44100 Hz only or your gig file will not be usable with
other gig files at the same time.

Cheers,
Mark


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jun 30 2004 - 20:11:38 EEST