Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Linux music notation editor criteria
From: Jonathan Segel (jsegel_AT_magneticmotorworks.com)
Date: Thu Jul 15 2004 - 00:57:58 EEST
>Greetings:
> As promised, here's a set of test criteria used by Alan Belkin in
>his 1994 review of
>Special/custom notation:
> unusual staves
> simultaneous key signatures
> unconventional time signatures
as was pointed out recently (in re: MIDI) on the SuperCollider list,
commercial software development responds to its customer base's
desires (to a certain extent) and the less desirable elements rarely
make it into the releases.
one thing that i've always had to fudge in notation programs is
"free" time. imagine morton feldman trying to use finale (or
whatever) - headless notes put in places relative to one another
rather than a grid. in most programs i have used (digital
composer/mosaic, finale, sibelius) stem lengths can be shortened to
zero, but placement has to be fooled by adding invisible rests. what
a pain.
most scores i have made in the past few years have started in a
notation program and moved the files into a graphics program fairly
quickly. the ability to save a notation file as a graphic file is a
must, unless the notation program has major graphic editign
capabiulities.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Jonathan Segel -- MAGNETIC -- PO Box 460816 S.F. CA. 94146-0816
jsegel_AT_magneticmotorworks.com <-----> magsatellite_AT_yahoo.com
http://www.MagneticMotorworks.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jul 15 2004 - 01:03:21 EEST