Re: [linux-audio-user] Virtual Mixing Desk

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Virtual Mixing Desk
From: Russell Hanaghan (
Date: Mon Jul 19 2004 - 08:49:59 EEST

On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 20:12, R Parker wrote:
> --- Olivier Guilyardi <> wrote:
> > R Parker wrote:
> > > A drawback I see to the knob only mixer is it
> > limits
> > > the users ability to visually associate what they
> > hear
> > > with what they see.
> >
> > Trouble is sliders are space-taking.
> Understood.
> It occurs to me that I am commenting on a mixer design
> and I don't even know what this mixer is for. What is
> its primary purpose?
> If live mixing softsynths (monitor mixing), then new
> knobishy widget might not be problematic.
> If control room mixing, then "typical" knobs are
> problematic.
> What about a
> > colorful approach :
> > A little square which is white for 0, black for 1,
> > and taking a scale of
> > gray colors for intermediate values. You'd ajust it
> > the same way as a
> > knob, pressing the mouse button and going up/down,
> > or with the mouswheel.
> >
> > It wouldn't remind the user of any physical
> > equivalent, but it would
> > better suit the digital interface. With a hue scale
> > (HSV color model),
> > instead of a gray one, the visual impact could be
> > pretty efficient,
> > though it would require some practice to get used to
> > it.
> A colored hue scale using metering colors could be
> interesting; yellow = low, orange = medium, red = hot.
> Whatever the colors are, they need to help you solve
> problems without thinking. If they're to gawdy, it'll
> be nothing but a blur. Simple example, the cowbell is
> obscured by the guitar, the cowbell has plenty of
> headroom gain or it doesn't. Ideally, the conclusion
> can be reached in a fraction of a second.
> Have you tried the LADSPA plugins as Ardour presents
> them? There is no "slider." The space that would be a
> slider is a transluscent single shade. You left-mouse
> + click and drag the hue around. It's interesting.
> Maybe instead of knobs you have circular shaped and
> appropriately thick lines with the hues of meters and
> you do the left-mouse+click and drag to adjust levels.
> Is that close to what you're imagining?
> Just reread your proposal and squares or rectangels
> are probably better because it would be easier to
> interpret levels at a glance.
> I guess the summation of my point is that a mixer
> interface needs to convey information. Imagine that
> we're monitor mixing on the side of a dark stage for a
> major label touring show. Maybe the mixer should be
> user definable layers of sliders; layer 1 is drums, 2
> bass and guitars, 3 keyboards, 4 backing vocals, etc.
> The user can define the number of sliders for each
> layer and each of them is exposed with a soft button
> push.
> The routes are user definable so the drums could run
> through a bus. This enables the user to adjust the
> output level of the entire group or any individual
> instrument. I suppose the master/Stereo bus fader
> should be exposed at all times.
> Is this mixer designed to we can MMC bind hardware
> faders to its level adjusting things?
> Anyway, I haven't read the thread on lad but I noticed
> a monstor long one over there. I really shouldn't
> comment on this topic because I didn't read that
> thread. Besides, if God hadn't created John Deer, I'd
> be out in the field with a pitch fork. Damned it
> though, it would be a fancy pitch fork.
> ron
> > --
> > og
> >

I've decided, after much thoughts <sheepish grin goes here> that I don't
like Knobs OR Sliders!

How about a little widget that looks like a faucet?!! Or perhaps a
pneumatic valve that connects to a control lever such as on a backhoe or
bull dozer?? Perhaps a throttle widget like in aircraft cockpits? Or
even a clip widget like on an intravenous drip line> Yeah! That's the

I'm sorry...I can't help myself! :) I am a bit surprised at the level
of passion over snobs versus ....whatever. I am kind of
fond of the backhoe lever though. We could then put international
symbols for loud and quiet. Loud = Rabbit & Quiet = Turtle.

All in good fun peeps. Don't take me seriously. My wife doesn't! :)


> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jul 19 2004 - 08:55:40 EEST