Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] gnome-terminal performance
From: Florin Andrei (florin_AT_andrei.myip.org)
Date: Sat Jul 31 2004 - 22:34:23 EEST
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 12:30, Chris Pickett wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-list/2004-July/thread.html#00071
> > Am i crazy? Am i the only one who thinks that the current incarnation of
> > gnome-terminal is slow and a resource hog?
> No. I recently tried just about every terminal I could get my hands on,
> and settled on using aterm like this:
> aterm -bg black -fg white +sb -tr -sh 15 -sl 10000 -si -sk -fn 8x13 -ls
> -geometry 80x36
Nice. But it seems focused on "cute" features such as transparent
background and such.
Are you sure it's the fastest, leanest one?
> and I have room for four of them at once not overlapping.
Ahhh... I fondly remember the days when i could do that with
For some obscure reason, no matter how much i tweak it, i can't get it
nowadays to occupy exactly 1/4 of my screen (with two 24 pix control
panels on top and at the bottom of the screen).
-- Florin Andrei
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Jul 31 2004 - 22:36:11 EEST