Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Encrypted remote X11 app (Was Unencrypted remote X11 app, Was: headless audio apps)
From: Malcolm Baldridge (linux-audio_AT_paypc.com)
Date: Sun Aug 01 2004 - 02:23:56 EEST
> That wouldn't affect the CPU load on a remote machine. The current
> release uses SDL, which problably isn't very romte friendly.
It *WOULD* affect the load on the remote CPU, after all, IT is the one
really executing the code. The "local" workstation is just doing display
routines and is basically a terminal. The "real" lifting is performed on
the remote system. Any "waste" within the Meterbridge processing code would
be felt on the system which is actually executing it.
Unless our terminologies are reversed: I usually refer to the X "server"
side to be the remote, and the "display client" to be the "local". My
apologies if we're talking about it from opposite sides.
=MB=
-- A focus on Quality.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 02:27:08 EEST