Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] OSC cumbersomeness?
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Aug 06 2004 - 00:24:31 EEST
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 02:50:05PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> >From: Dave Robillard <drobilla_AT_connect.carleton.ca>
> >
> >> PVM? That way you could stretch it across a cluster.
> >
> >aaaand yet again OSC. :)
>
> MPI has replaced PVM because PVM was cumbersome to use.
> Considering that, could it be that OSC is as cumbersome to
> use as PVM?
>
> Anyone would like to post a short code which creates, sends
> and receives OSC messages? I could then compare it to the
> MPI and PVM examples and find out which one is closer to OSC.
That would depend on the API, not the protocol, but there are some liblo
examples here:
http://plugin.org.uk/liblo/examples/
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Aug 06 2004 - 00:29:31 EEST