Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Best distro for Audio??
From: Laura Conrad (lconrad_AT_laymusic.org)
Date: Fri Aug 06 2004 - 14:34:50 EEST
>>>>> "Russell" == Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan_AT_starband.net> writes:
Russell> Can I get some basic pros and cons of the different
Russell> distro's you're using? And especially from previous
Russell> Mandrake users.
I switched from Mandrake to Debian in November of 2002, because I
couldn't keep urpmi working for more than about a month at a time, and
I never once managed to upgrade to a new Mandrake version. Debian
with apt and dpkg is much solider from those points of view than
Mandrake and urpmi.
Not that there aren't sometimes problems in Debian when you upgrade
everything at once, but apt-get and dpkg still work, and you can
usually upgrade only the things you're really interested in.
The audio I use is pretty minimal, and I haven't had packaging related
problems with it, as far as I know.
The only important package I know about that works a lot better under
Mandrake than under Debian is xemacs. I've ended up switching to
emacs because of the Debian xemacs packaging.
-- Laura (mailto:lconrad_AT_laymusic.org , http://www.laymusic.org/ ) (617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011 233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Aug 06 2004 - 14:39:01 EEST