[linux-audio-user] Re: hdparm

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-user] Re: hdparm
From: Matt Barber (brbrofsvl_AT_aol.com)
Date: Tue Sep 07 2004 - 23:16:30 EEST


Knecht:
->Not sure I can help, but I end up with a few questions from reading
this. Maybe your answers will lead someone else to give you a good
pointer. Mostly I'm confused about your hda/hdb comments with respect to
  SATA drives which are normally on a cable by themselves. In my
experience hda/hdb are the EIDE drive designations. With two controllers
you then get hda-hdd for EIDE and hde for SATA.<-

I know, it's really weird. The motherboard/chipset actually puts the
SATA drive on the primary master channel (hda). I think that's what's
screwing me up. I'd have to remove it if I wanted to put some other
device on primary master, since I can't move it to another channel or to
a normal standalone SATA channel.

->If you are really using EIDE drives then switching the order of the
drives can be a problem *if* the drives were not configured for
auto-detect *and* you forgot to change the jumpers. I don't know if this
would cause the problem that you are seeing though.<-

No, I set the jumpers to master/slave manually... also tried
"cable-select." No dice. Seems to me there are two really weird issues
with how linux sees the ide channels on my board:

1) SATA drive is ALWAYS hda - no way to change that in BIOS (this is a
DFI motherboard, by the way, with the nforce2 chipset)

2) Secondary Slave is seen as scd0 (at least with the CD/DVD RW).
Hdparm sees the DVD drive as hdd (I can hdparm /dev/hdd), but I can't
access the drive through /dev/hdd - /dev/cdrom is a link to /dev/scd0.
It works as hdb or hdc if I put it on another channel. Weird weird.
Grub lives on hda (I'm currently dual-booting), but when I put the ide
drive with the /boot partition on (what should be) the hdd channel, the
kernel (which lives on that drive) panics because it can't find init.
It's a really messed up setup, which I assume is probably to get around
some problem in windows or something, though - I've had nothing but
problems with windows, too. I'm ready to ditch this board once a load
of cash falls into my lap. =o)

I'm wondering if this is an nforce thing, or if there's something else
on the board that's causing it (anyone have an asus nforce2 board? Is
it similar?) - could be the SATA controller... also, with this chipset
you have to feed acpi=off noapic nolapic to the kernel to get the damn
thing to run in the first place (some of you may remember a post I sent
about setting the system bus clock to the appropriate value).... anyway,
it's been a real hassle all around.

Maybe the 2.6 kernel would work with it better, but I'm hesitant to put
it on there right now, since this is my only computer.

Matt


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Sep 07 2004 - 23:26:10 EEST