Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Converting sample rate: failed...
From: Erik de Castro Lopo (erikd-lad_AT_mega-nerd.com)
Date: Tue Sep 14 2004 - 01:09:53 EEST
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:11:20 -0700
davidrclark_AT_earthlink.net wrote:
> I also used my own resampler (FFT overlap type) and heard no difference
> between the original and that one. So all three sounded almost identical
> to me, but not quite. There was a teensy-weensy difference with the sinc-
> based one, but it actually sounded a teensy-weensy bit better, not worse!
Yeeee Haaaaaa!!!! :-).
Erik
-- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo nospam_AT_mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ I have found that good programmers either do not make the kind of mistakes that Ada can prevent, or insert enough checks that they catch those mistakes about as efficiently as an Ada environment can. At that point, the use of Ada gives no further productivity advantage.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Sep 14 2004 - 01:15:27 EEST