Re: why open source drivers [was Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more]

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: why open source drivers [was Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more]
From: Marek Peteraj (marpet_AT_naex.sk)
Date: Mon Nov 29 2004 - 04:19:14 EET


On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 00:58, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:25:09 +0100, Marek Peteraj <marpet_AT_naex.sk> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 21:31, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> >
> > One nice example. Korg 1212 i/o, worked under win98, doesn't under winXP
> > because korg does not provide support for it. There is an alsa driver
> > for it now(and specs), so basically the life of that card is extended to
> > eternity.
> >
> > There are more such damn good reasons for open source drivers. People
> > just don't shout too loud. :)
>
> Fair enough. There are companies here in Silicon Valley that take over
> 'end of life' chip designs and manufacturer them for a while to help
> customers, but there isn't much money in it most of the time, just as
> there is probably no financial reason for Korg to support that card. I
> didn't like it when DigiDesign said they weren't going to continue to
> support the 001 forever and I was forced into buying an 002 or going
> away from Windows. Unortunately there was no other platform that
> maintained my music investment as well so I stuck with Digi.
>
> That's the nature of technology. It gets outdated. Not too many
> companies making buggy whips anymore either...
>
> >> However how did Marek end up being an RME customer when
> > > there was (as far as I know) never any support for this device under
> > > Linux, nor anyone even really saying there would be?
> >
> > Actually not quite, it seemed as if there would be support, Thomas
> > wanted to do the driver. I just invested too much trust in RME. My
> > fault.
>
> And I am very sorry about that.

You don't have to be.

> It is a disappointment I'm sure.
> You're a long ways away. If it was more practical I'd probably buy the
> unit from you. I have uses. I'm sure others will too. You'll sell it
> and get good money. Chalk the loss up to learning and
> remember..."Trust, but verify".

Agreed. It was a lesson to learn. Thanks for your 'heads up' :)

>
> >
> > > In my case I Was
> > > told that supporting the HDSP 9652 would be a non-issue based on the
> > > DigiFace working. It turned out to be true, but then again it took
> > > about a year to become really useful to me, and even today doesn't
> > > work as well as it does under Windows. How did he end up with this
> > > device and in this position?
> > >
> > > I somehow don't think this is RME's fault...
> >
> > If RME did the drivers for your HDSP 9652 then you could directly
> > contact them and ask them for support. I'm sure Thomas would help you
> > aswell if he had the card, and that's the problem. In such case claiming
> > that they do support alsa is just plain unfair.
>
> ???? RME never 'supported' the card under Linux. The 'supported' the
> developers by providing technical info. I did not purchase the card
> because of RME telling me it would be OK to use the card under Linux.
> They never stated such things.

Unfortunately they did. To quote a part of their response:
"> [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more

Complete BS. We have and will support Linux/Alsa as before. The only
excluded product is the Fireface."

Marek


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Nov 29 2004 - 02:37:28 EET