Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]
From: Rick Taylor (RickTaylor_AT_speakeasy.net)
Date: Sun Dec 19 2004 - 14:21:10 EET

Next message: Christoph Eckert: "Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread [WAS: Tuning Program or wav files?]"
Previous message: Jan Depner: "Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread [WAS: Tuning Program or wav files?]"
In reply to: Dave Robillard: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"
Next in thread: Andreas Kuckartz: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"
Reply: Rick Taylor: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"

On Friday 17 December 2004 08:10 am, Dave Robillard wrote:

> Seriously. I'm not trying to be mean, or critical, or whatever. If you
> don't care about the freedom of it, why use Linux?

It's a better os with much more potential than any system out there?

-- 
www.RTaylor-Design.Com

Next message: Christoph Eckert: "Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread [WAS: Tuning Program or wav files?]"
Previous message: Jan Depner: "Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread [WAS: Tuning Program or wav files?]"
In reply to: Dave Robillard: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"
Next in thread: Andreas Kuckartz: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"
Reply: Rick Taylor: "Re: [linux-audio-user] (OSS vs. RME) vs. (OSS + RME) [slightly OT]"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Dec 20 2004 - 02:29:23 EET