Re: [linux-audio-user] spectral correction

Thanks for clearing that up. I thought it would be something like that,
which is why I said I wasn't sure :) It would be quite handy to have a
short list of the differences somewhere so that new users can decide
which to try first.

Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen wrote:

>Nathaniel Virgo:
>
>
>>I don't remember ever using it but I think the Ceres spectral editor
>>does what you want, possibly, along with all kinds of other funky
>>stuff. There seem to be several versions by different people, I think
>>ceres3 is the most recent but I'm not sure.
>>
>>
>
>Not really. Ceres3 is based on a ~10 year old fork of Ceres. Both Ceres3
>and Ceres are both still being actively developed independently of each
>other. They both have theire pros and cons. Generally (and probably
>stupid) said, ceres is more fancy while ceres3 is more academic.
>
>I'm thinking about renaming Ceres as Ceres4, because Ceres3 sounds
>newer and better than Ceres. But if I did, Ceres4 would sounds newer
>and better than Ceres3 again, which might not be true either.
>
>(Well, to be hounest, I sometimes think Ceres3 should be named something
>non-ceres though. It is a bit confusing.)
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Jan 6 20:15:19 2005