On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 14:53, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 07:58, Jan Depner wrote:
> > When did this happen? Can you give me some specifics on what is no
> > longer backward compatible? We've been paying $4000 a seat for licenses
> > and they have yet to break backward compatibility. Whenever we get a
> > new release they tell us to replace the old one. If they're going to
> > break things we're going to stop giving them money ;-) So far none of
> > my Qt apps have broken.
>
> Interesting. The original qt included in fc1 is qt 3.1.2-14. All qt apps
> included in fc1 are dynamically linked (and were compiled) against this
> version. The multithreaded dynamic libraries are (in this version):
> libqt-mt.so.3.1.2
> (3.1.1 in rh9)
> For qt version 3.3.3 the version is:
> libqt-mt.so.3.3.3
>
> I originally tried to just upgrade the qt packages instead of creating a
> new, different package. When I tried installing qt 3.3.3 as an rpm
> upgrade, rpm itself complained about broken dependencies (ie: the new qt
> would not work with older applications according to rpm - I don't
> remember what were the missing dependencies).
>
> I've done a little bit of research and I think the problem was not in
> the qt library itself but in some additional libraries that were part of
> the package (I'm not a qt expert so I don't know what they are).
>
> In qt 3.1.x some apps depend not only on qt-*.so but also on
> libqtassistantclient.so, which is not present in my qt 3.3 builds. I
> can't be completely sure without rebuilding everything but most probably
> that was the dependency that was not allowing a clean upgrade from qt
> 3.1 to qt 3.3 (current apps I have in rh9 that depend on that include
> qt-designer - of course - but also PyQt, kaconnect, qjackconnect,
> qarecord, qamix and ams). Hmm, all apps done by the same author, maybe
> it is a build problem and that library is not really necessary? Or maybe
> just a packaging problem?
>
> On rh9 there is also a direct dependency by redhat-artwork on
> /usr/lib/qt-3.1, that's probably because the bluecurve theme is not
> included in the qt package but rather in the redhat-artwork package. I
> included the bluecurve stuff in qt33 explicitly.
>
> Most probably you don't have apps that depend on libqassistantclient (or
> you have not tried to run them) and that is why you don't have any
> problems.
>
That would make sense. Thanks for the info.
Jan
Received on Mon Jan 10 08:15:05 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 10 2005 - 08:15:06 EET