--- Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:02:28 -0800 (PST)
> R Parker <rtp405@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > I'm hesitant about returning to ext2 because I've
> had
> > fsck blow up in my face more than once...guess
> that's
> > why I rsync to a big IDE HD. I do expect ext2
> > performance to be perfectly acceptable.
>
> what's wrong with ext3?
I haven't got any experience with it and want to use a
file system that I know will read and write 16 to 24
tracks without any disk access errors. The person that
suggested reiserfs to me had tested it and ext3 and
thought reiserfs was the better of the two. This was
six months ago and I talked about it with him again
several days ago. Again no benchmark numbers to
support any conclusions just the thoughts of a couple
knuckleheads that are trying to do it.
ron
> flo
>
> --
> Palimm Palimm!
> http://affenbande.org/~tapas/
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Received on Fri Jan 21 20:15:18 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 21 2005 - 20:15:19 EET