On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:15:56 +0100, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 06:55:45PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
>
>
> > In the case of JAMin it was dictated by our desire to use FFTW rather
> > than writing our own FFT and trying to figure out how to divide the
> > computation into relatively equal parts.
>
> For Jamin, you have two channels, each one needs a Fwd and an Inv FFT,
> so that would already be 4 approx. equal parts (assuming the FFT dominates
> the work to be done).
Actually there is on fwd, and 3 inv per channel, each xover band is a
seperate inv FFT.
- Steve
Received on Mon Jan 31 12:15:14 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 31 2005 - 12:15:16 EET