Jack O'Quin wrote:
> A recent, stable 2.6.x kernel is also an easy option. I'm getting as
> good or better LL results with vanilla 2.6.10 than with 2.4.19 and the
> LL patches. I have not tried 2.6.11 yet, but expect it to be even
> better.
I just upgraded from 2.6.9 to 2.6.11 (both vanilla) and the occational
pop is gone. That leaves me with 5.8ms of latency, which is acceptable
for now. If I get a need-for-speed or get into trouble I'll get back.
Thanks for the pointers.
BTW: My 2.6.11 .config is here:
http://atte.dk/linux/.config
-- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dkReceived on Mon Mar 7 00:15:10 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 07 2005 - 00:15:10 EET