Re: [linux-audio-user] fighting skype ...

From: tommy <illth@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Mar 19 2005 - 00:22:35 EET

Rob schrieb:

>On Friday 18 March 2005 15:44, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>
>
>>I know very little about skype and don't have much time or personal
>>interest in learning about it. But, it's making inroads. I want to
>>understand what it does and what free software alternatives are
>>available. Is it possible for free software alternatives to inter
>>operate with the skype world?
>>
>>
>
>Free software VOIP typically takes the form of SIP, or Session
>Initiation Protocol, which is as close to a standard for end users as
>VOIP really has. Skype doesn't have any SIP gateways as far as I
>know, though they're supposed to offer something called "SkypeIn"
>this summer to do that. Personally, I'd rather just avoid them
>altogether, as it seems what they've brought to the mix is primarily
>marketing.
>
>
yes, but contrary to SIP and h232, skype uses some p2p protocol,
that minimizes their server load (according to skype). thats no big
deal for the user, as long as he / she can still find an free sip / h323
service provider, but as bandwith does cost money, this might be a
problem.

another point of skype is that it can (does) "missuse" some skypers
that are not behind a NAT as some sort of server to connect two
NAT'ed skype users - that means: skype just works, without any
configuration, and no matter if u and the person u are calling is
behind a NAT. this might be the reason 4 skype's popularity, and
there is no OS software i know of that has similar features.

>I would say Linphone is the most widely used free SIP client software,
>at least under Linux. Linspire seems to be throwing some money at
>PhoneGaim, though, so maybe it'll be grandmother-friendly before
>Linphone.
>
>Rob
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sat Mar 19 04:15:07 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 19 2005 - 04:15:08 EET