> > Steve, there is actually a glitch in time when you main bypass.
> > Could that be changed to the non-glitching behaviour of bypassing
> > the limiter?
>
> That glitch is just the change in amplitude (I think, at least with
> the CVS version), its much less serious than the glitch you get from
> changing the latency suddenly.
>
> - Steve
Steve, it's a glitch in _time_, it's clearly audible (CVS from just
now). To nail it down I did
jack_metro -b 120 -> jamin -> ardour (set tempo to 120)
and recorded a track of it, like 4 beats non-bypassed, 4 beats
bypassed ... Visually aligned the non-bypassed beats with Ardour's
beatlines. It's clearly visible too: The bypassed beats are ~1800
frames early.
So, this is no drama, really. But you say there should be no such thing
and that we cannot have, now can we :?
Wolfgang
Received on Thu Mar 31 04:15:17 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 31 2005 - 04:15:18 EEST