On Fri, 01 Apr, 2005 at 08:44AM -0500, Dave Phillips spake thus:
> Greetings:
>
> I routinely top-post in compliance with the wishes of blind members of
> this and other lists. They use tts readers for their mail and do not
> wish to re-read the original post.
>
> Best,
>
> dp
>
I tend to do this. If it's a short original message, I post at the
bottom. If I want to address several points from the original, I
interleave my post to give context. If it's a long post, I stick it
at the top. That seems to suit most people.
>
> Mark Constable wrote:
>
> >On Friday 01 April 2005 20:11, mprims@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Please excuse top-posting.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ^^^^^^^
> >>This is the 2nd time in a few days I see this term used.
> >>What does it mean?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Enter "top vs bottom posting" into google. This reply, for
> >instance, is bottom-posted.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-- "I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you." (By Vance Petree, Virginia Power)Received on Fri Apr 1 20:15:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 20:15:06 EEST