Re: OT: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Re: OTT

From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@email-addr-hidden-job.com>
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 22:09:21 EEST

On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 20:32 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> \|/
> -0-
> /|\
>
> Here are some more:
>
> On Friday 01 April 2005 12:58, tim hall wrote:
> > Last Friday 01 April 2005 02:01, Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen was like:
> > > Q: How many linux audio users does it take to change a light bulb?
>
> Two users argue whether gtk/gnome- or qt/kde-lightbulbs look better,
> accompanied by two or three developers argueing which of the systems is
> better/easier/cleaner for programming and maintaining a lightbulb.
> Two more developers chip in here wether C++ is better than C or not for
> bringing a bulb to function. After the fifth "OT" in the subject, one of the
> old ones complains about missing the one and only language for lightbulbs:
> Assambler.

One to explain that despite what the box says we don't support 24/96 yet
with that particular light bulb.

Lee
Received on Sat Apr 2 00:15:06 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 02 2005 - 00:15:06 EEST