Re: [linux-audio-user] preempt or low latency

From: John Anderson <ardour@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:36:29 EEST

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 10:10 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 08:10 +0100, anahata wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > > Or just use 2.6. 2.6.11 OOTB has better latency than 2.4 with those
> > > patches.
> > >
> >
> > At last! Am I right in thinking that this is the first release of 2.6 of
> > which that's true? Time for an upgrade, as I see Debian's up to 2.6.11 now.
>
> 2.6.12 should be out within a week or two. And my tests with 2.6.12-rc1
> show it's even better than 2.6.11. So if you're still on 2.4 you might
> want to wait.

OK, so using 2.6.12 provides better latencies that 2.4.x with pre-empt +
lowlatency patches?

Or do we still need to apply Ingo's patches to 2.6.12?

bye
John
Received on Fri Apr 8 20:15:07 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:15:09 EEST