Russell Hanaghan wrote:
> Esben Stien wrote:
>
>> Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan@email-addr-hidden> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>> it's FREE
>>>
>>
>>
>> This code is not free in the sense most of us consider it. Please see
>> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
>>
>> A more proper word for this code is a gratis proprietary binary.
>>
>> It's as far away from free software as possible.
>> ``Free software'' is a matter of liberty, not price.
>> You should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without
>> modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to
>> anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other
>> things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission.
>>
>> In order for the freedoms to make changes, and to publish improved
>> versions, to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of
>> the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary
>> condition for free software.
>>
>>
>>
> Ok ok...So here's clarification....You won't have to pay any money for
> this plugin!!
>
> R~
>
You often don't have to pay any money for commercial plug-ins, either.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 11 2005 - 00:15:17 EEST