On Tuesday 12 Apr 2005 02:18, Paul Davis wrote:
> >The VST-per-server implementation might not, but there's no very
> >compelling reason not to have multiple VSTs in a single server serving
> >multiple clients. That would be less reliable than a dssi-vst type
> >service can be, but no less reliable than fst, and it should scale
> >nearly as well. It's been on my todo list for ages...
>
> i still don't think that scales. the cache might still be warm, since
> the server is repeatedly invoked, but its still 2 context switches
> per-plugin invocation
DSSI has a mechanism for coalescing these (which is what I was thinking of)
but of course it's for synths only, and makes no sense (in the host) for
effects.
Chris
Received on Wed Apr 13 00:15:13 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 13 2005 - 00:15:13 EEST