On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:57 -0700, Iain Duncan wrote:
> >
> > yeah, i got this as well ... hasn't seemed to have any noticeable
> > effects, though.
>
> Huh? Does that mean the kernel image is built anyway? I was under the
> impression that it meant it didn't finish compiling? Am I confused?
If the error was in building a module that you don't use, then it would
be harmless. This seems to be the case.
Lee
Received on Wed Jul 13 00:15:25 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 13 2005 - 00:15:26 EEST