Re: [linux-audio-user] Problems appling realtime preempt patch to 2.6.12 (general)

From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jul 13 2005 - 18:10:41 EEST

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 06:42:29PM +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote:
> > I've just joined the list and it's pretty interesting.
> > Can someone tell me something about the differences between
> > the preempt patch from Ingo and the "Realtime Linux
> > Security Module"? I currently use the latter one and I'm
> > quite satisfied as jack works really fast. Perhaps one
> > should try this way instead of the vanilla kernel patch.
> > There have to be pros and cons I'm interested in. Can
> > someone point them out?
> same for me, but RT-LSM has been dropped by Andrew Morton in
> the 2.6.12-mm kernels, so we should start using preemt.
> Unfortunately, even for me RT-LSM gives much better results
> than preemption. And even with the RT-LSM I get "only"
> 16msecs latencies.

Christoph, is there any reason you wouldn't use both preemption and
rt-lsm at the same time?

Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any 
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
Received on Wed Jul 13 20:15:22 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 13 2005 - 20:15:23 EEST