Re: [linux-audio-user] So, no dice on the PAM RLimits patch?

From: thewade <pdman@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Aug 20 2005 - 08:46:37 EEST

Thanks Fernando for the patch!

I had a little supprise once I installed the patched pam from source:
after shutdown I couldn't get back in!
I used a rescue disk though and fixed pam by removing all occurances of
the $ISA variable in each of the files in pam.d, as I was getting
/var/log/messages about pam not being able to find some of the .so files.

My next questions are:
1. Why won't pam do what it needs to with this $ISA variable?
2. Now that I have a running RT kernel and a patched for rlimits pam
with all users having "realtime" permissions; how should I start jackd
and pd to take advantage of these changes?
I run:
nice -5 qjackctl (starting jackd with a priority of 89 as that seems to
be as high a priority as qjackctl will let me pass)
nice -5 pd
But my latency values are about the same as running:
qjackctl (and jackd at 0 priority)
pd

...?

Thanks for the continued help!
-thewade
Received on Sat Aug 20 08:15:06 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 20 2005 - 08:15:06 EEST