Re: [linux-audio-user] latency: video card contribution

From: Sampo Savolainen <v2@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Sep 29 2005 - 09:35:24 EEST

Quoting "Dmitry S. Baikov" <c0ff@email-addr-hidden>:

> > Depends on the laptop but possibly. Why so stringent about 64/2? Do
> > you _really_ require sub-3mS?
> >
> Processing live inputs better be done with lowest latency.
> Since 64/2 is only a part of total latency, increasing this value is
> noticable. Especially when playing guitar.

A little rudimentary math tells you that:
http://www.google.com/search?q=speed+of+sound+*+3+ms

In 3 milliseconds, the sound travels in air for 1.02 meters. Even if you go
to 4 times the latency (256x2), the time that your computer processes one
frame is faster than what the response time stadium rockers get from their gear.

Of course, this is all additive. If you're supposed to run things through
your computer and then onwards to a large stage, all extra latency will hurt.

 Sampo
Received on Thu Sep 29 12:15:12 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 29 2005 - 12:15:12 EEST