Re: [linux-audio-user] measurement: jaaa won`t work on my 64bit amd

From: carmen <ix@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Oct 15 2005 - 03:29:11 EEST

On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 01:42:03AM +0000, sonicx wrote:
> Hy again,
> sadly there is not much reference for jaaa, and it wont spit out any
> errors (regarding my problem). first off i thought it would work, but
> after a while i figured that it should have got a window,which it hasnt.
> no options make any difference,besides from giving errors if i set up a
> wrong device or such. just no window. i took a look at main.cc (i guess
> the .cc tell me this is ansi-c?) and i guessed that those X_blabla
> functions it uses to handle the windows dont work. so i guessed it might
> be the clxclient lib that i installed as it is needed that may be faulty
> (or are those "plain" X-calls?), but it compiled a 64bit and a 32bit
> version,both fine, and jaaa also compiles fine with both,but still no
> window... well not pure 32bit ,as my X11 includes are 64bit. and maybe
> not real 64bit too-i just changed the dirs in the Makefile to their
> 64bit equivalents, i dont know if i must activate other flags or so to
> compile to 64bit,besides that i dont know if any part of jaaa would
> benefit.
> well,many compiles-no working proggi.if someone has ideas - i would even
> _try_ coding them. i guess it would be possible to port jaaa into a nice
> kde application,but right now,and especially at this late time =), this
> would present some problems for me. although the jaaa itself shouldnt be
> to hard to port another windows system,from a first look-but what can i
> say,i never saw the program actually running =(.
> i dont really know where to start.i thought of putting some cheap
> debugging code into jaaa,telling me where exactly it stops. does jaaa
> run on 64bit machines?

yep. uses a ton of CPU though so i use pd GUi objects instead..

noticed in your header: Red Hat/1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1 . could be due to redhat breakage..i know they used to like to tweak out their kernel and libc..might want to try something else..

 and i havent found but a single version of source
> (0.1.2),is there maybe a newer version around? i`d be willing to test
> and puzzle all the way =).
> mfg
> sonicx
Received on Sat Oct 15 04:15:07 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 15 2005 - 04:15:08 EEST