Re: [linux-audio-user] terrible sineshaper dependencies

From: carmen <ix@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Nov 07 2005 - 03:22:00 EET

On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:50:03PM -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 19:56 +1100, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-05-11 at 19:46 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > > I've had people with these problems numerous times with Om as well
> > > > (which also depends on Gtkmm), exclusively with Fedora. I can't
> > > > possibly understand how Fedora doesn't have the very widely used
> > > > official C++ bindings to GTK. How many packages do they have? 12?
> > >
> > > Fedora Core 3: 1653
> > > Fedora extras 3: 1703
> > > (unofficial count :-)
> >
> > $ apt-cache search . | sed 's/ - .*//' | sort | uniq | wc -l
> > 17251

 find /usr/portage | grep Manifest | wc -l
10261

is it some kind of issue for Fedora to have multiple versions installed? gtkmm-2.2.12 (and 2.8.1) are installed here, but it seems the only one that needs 2.2.12 is media-sound/seq24-0.7.0, tisk-tisk...

> >
> > Therefore Debian is roughly 10 times as awesome as Fedora.

but it could definitely use the fedora to cover its balding head :)

> >
> > QED. :)
>
> I am convinced. Bigger is better.
>
> I would have been very dissapointed if nobody would have posted bigger
> package counts from Debian :-)
>
> -- Fernando
>
Received on Mon Nov 7 04:15:05 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 07 2005 - 04:15:06 EET