On Monday 31 October 2005 17:01, Cesare wrote:
> The definition of 'normalization' in the description of the software
> linked below is, IMHO, too vague. And normalization is not enough for
> your purpose.
I agree, that's why I am thinking that I need _average_ meters
> To my understanding, normalization means finding the maxpeak level of
> the entire track and scale the signal to use the highest possible level
> without having distortion (when there's the maximum peak).
>
> I suggest that you *just need to trust your ears*, listening to the
> first track and the adjusting the volume of the second according to your
> perception. A compressor/limiter would help with the peaks.
>
> Try this instead:
>
> http://jamin.sourceforge.net/
Nice info, I remastered the song with this info, thanks
> or just apply a compressor before the output of your audio software of
> choice.
>
> c.
> www.cesaremarilungo.com
>
> Andrew Lewis wrote:
> >Marcos Guglielmetti wrote:
> >>As instance, suppose I want to master my song at a similar RMS level as
> >>another audio file has.
> >>What should I use?
> >
> >http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~cvaill/normalize/
> >
> >-Drew
-- Marcos Guglielmetti Coordinador del desarrollo de Musix GNU+Linux (www.musix.org.ar) fecha: sáb nov 12 21:05:01 CET 2005 ___________________________________________________________ 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo http://correo.yahoo.com.arReceived on Mon Nov 14 08:15:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 14 2005 - 08:15:06 EET