Pete Leigh wrote:
>On 18/11/05, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
>>USB 2.0 uses 8000 microframes per second, but EHCI don't interrupt more often
>>than once per millisecond by default, so it doesn't make a difference.
>>
>>
>
>
>
So latency doesn't improve over USB 2.0? That's interesting.
Thanks.
c.
>[and much other useful and clear information]
>
>Thanks, Clemens! I think I might just take my chances on the UR-80, so
>make sure your "please show the lsusb -v output for this device" keyboard
>macro is up and running ;-)
>
>Seriously, thanks for your input - much appreciated.
>
>- Pete.
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Nov 18 16:15:07 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 18 2005 - 16:15:07 EET