Re: [linux-audio-user] Yawn! Linux v Windoze, a new twist?

Hi
My system dual boots Linux/Windows. I have software I could not afford
on the Linux part of my box & muse / rosegarden actually sound audibly
better (IMHO) than my modest copy of Cubasis. I have not figured out
how to recompile my Windows kernel for low latency (snigger) & when I
use midi yoke for soft synths the latency is unworkable, unlike Linux &
Jack. I have also made a 'live' music production disk using Slackware &
Linux Live & have yet to figure out how to do that on Windows (snigger
snigger).

I have to dual boot because of specialist software in another area I
use, but for music I use Linux: for someone in my situation there is no
contest.
Regards
Guy

studio-64 wrote:

> Hi I'm sure some on here can think of a few comments to add to this:
> Linux v Windoze debate.
>
> I note two revealing comments.
>
> "if a subject of the study (vendor for example) is behind its funding,
> whether directly (as in this study)"
>
> and
>
> "it's important to recognize the small sample size in drawing any
> conclusions from the data."
>
>
> Would it not be better for the guy to not agreee to do the study?
>
> http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/28/1245256
>
>
> I also note there is no debate as regards DAW's and other more niche
> systems.
>
> My systems would be impossible for me to fund on anything else apart
> from Linux.
>
>
> Cheers
> Bob
>
>
>
>
> Bearmusic
> hearmymusic.co.uk <http:www.hearmymusic.co.uk>
>
>
>
>

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/189 - Release Date: 30/11/2005
		
___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com