Re: [linux-audio-user] The best distro for music creation

From: Josh Lawrence <hardbop200@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Dec 05 2005 - 04:16:43 EET

I think that it is very suitable, *if* you know how to create your own
kernel that allows for jack, et al to run with preemptable
capabilities. I am not very knowledgeable with compiling kernels, so
I had to wait until someone else provided a how-to for getting my own
kernel.

Quite the contrary, I see big things on the horizon for Ubuntu. This
might be heresy, but I would like for Agnula to merge its efforts in
with Ubuntu, thus making both distributions more complete.

Josh

On 12/4/05, Steve Lindsay <stephen.a.lindsay@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 12/4/05, Christoph Eckert <ce@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > With all the press about Ubuntu I'd imaginge it's
> > > worth a look, but I don't know who uses it for audio.
> >
> > I heard rumors that it's a bit hard to convert it into an audio machine,
> > but I also heard about people who have been very successful using it
> > for audio.
> >
>
> Can you elaborate on what makes it hard? Is it just that the kernel is
> not optimised for this sort of stuff or are there other things that
> make ubuntu not suitable for linux audio?
>
> I'm just starting to look at getting into linux audio and am a bit of
> an ubuntu tragic so am interested in what makes it unsuitable.
>
> Cheers.....Steve
>
>

--
Josh
Received on Mon Dec 5 08:15:04 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 05 2005 - 08:15:04 EET