On 12/12/05, tim hall <tech@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 December 2005 21:19, guy was like:
> > but it does raise aesthetic/ethical issues about
> > music as a result of ones ability versus music as a result of ones vision.
>
> I disagree. It's the same as all new technology. It's cool if you either a)
> are the first person to do it or b) are cleverer about it than the last
> person who tried it AND it's musically relevant. Technology and ability are
> all means toward the ends of realising your visions. Using Linux deals with
> most of the ethical issues.
>
> So, it's not so much that you can't produce Boy Bands using Linux, just that
> Linux is a bit more picky about its Boy Bands. ;]
> --
> cheers,
>
> tim hall
> http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/tim
>
>
Amen, brother. Who cares how a sound was achieved, as long as the
result blows your mind?
The world of electronica, for instance, is as dense and full of
garbage as the world of porn, but when there's soul behind it, it
vibrates right through the cables and wires and into your
consciousness. (I'm thinking of U.N.K.L.E. and Massive Attack as I
write this)
--chris reisor
Received on Tue Dec 13 00:15:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 13 2005 - 00:15:07 EET